| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Purchase price | $475,000 |
| Closing costs (3%) | $14,250 |
| Renovation/repairs | $15,000 |
| Furnishing and setup | $25,000 |
| Total investment | $529,250 |
| Down payment (20%) | $95,000 |
| Closing costs + renovation + furnishing | $54,250 |
| Total cash invested | $149,250 |
| Loan amount | $380,000 |
| Season | Months | Avg Nightly Rate | Occupancy | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak | Jun-Aug (92 days) | $265 | 82% | $19,987 |
| Shoulder | Mar-May, Sep-Nov (183 days) | $195 | 68% | $24,271 |
| Off-season | Dec-Feb (90 days) | $145 | 48% | $6,264 |
| Annual total | 365 days | $50,522 | ||
| Cleaning fee income (8/month avg) | $7,200 | |||
| Total gross revenue | $57,722 |
| Expense | Annual Cost | % of Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Property management (20%) | $11,544 | 20.0% |
| Cleaning costs | $7,680 | 13.3% |
| Platform fees (3%) | $1,732 | 3.0% |
| Property taxes | $5,200 | 9.0% |
| Insurance | $2,400 | 4.2% |
| Utilities | $4,200 | 7.3% |
| Maintenance reserve (8%) | $4,618 | 8.0% |
| Supplies | $1,800 | 3.1% |
| WiFi/streaming | $1,440 | 2.5% |
| Landscaping | $1,200 | 2.1% |
| Total expenses | $41,814 | 72.4% |
| Metric | Value | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| NOI | $15,908 | Revenue - Expenses |
| Annual mortgage payment | $28,800 | $2,400/month x 12 |
| Annual cash flow | -$12,892 | NOI - Mortgage |
| Cap rate | 3.4% | NOI / Purchase Price |
| Cash-on-cash return | -8.6% | Cash Flow / Cash Invested |
| DSCR | 0.55 | NOI / Debt Service |
| Break-even occupancy | 91% | Costs / (Rate x 365) |
Verdict: This property is not viable at current assumptions. The expense ratio is too high, and the property produces negative cash flow. The investor should either negotiate a lower price, plan to self-manage, or pass on this deal.
| Mistake | Impact | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Using peak-season rates year-round | Overestimates revenue by 20-40% | Model seasonality separately |
| Omitting expense categories | Understates costs by 10-20% | Use comprehensive expense checklist |
| Ignoring platform fees | Missing 3-5% of revenue in costs | Include Airbnb/VRBO fees |
| No maintenance reserve | Unprepared for major repairs | Budget 5-10% of revenue |
| Using seller's revenue claims | Often inflated or cherry-picked | Verify with independent market data |
| Single-scenario analysis | False confidence in one outcome | Run conservative/moderate/optimistic |
A comprehensive STR pro forma should include projected revenue (nightly rates x occupancy x 365), all operating expenses by category, mortgage payments (principal and interest), net operating income, cash flow, cap rate, cash-on-cash return, ROI, DSCR, and break-even occupancy. It should also include purchase costs (price, closing costs, renovation, furnishing), financing terms, and sensitivity analysis showing outcomes at different occupancy levels.
Pro forma accuracy depends entirely on the quality of input assumptions. Projections based on actual comparable listing data are typically within 10-15% of reality, while those based on guesswork or seller claims can be off by 30-50%. The most common errors are overestimating occupancy, underestimating expenses, and ignoring seasonality. Always stress-test your pro forma with conservative, moderate, and optimistic scenarios to understand the range of possible outcomes.
Treat seller and agent pro formas as a starting point, never as gospel. They frequently overestimate revenue (using peak-season rates year-round), underestimate expenses (omitting categories like platform fees, supplies, or maintenance reserves), and use unrealistic occupancy assumptions. Always rebuild the pro forma using independent market data from tools like AirROI, verified comparable listings, and your own expense research before making any investment decisions.
Stay ahead of the curve
Join our newsletter for exclusive insights and updates. No spam ever.